{"id":3156,"date":"2026-03-25T09:47:00","date_gmt":"2026-03-25T08:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/?p=3156"},"modified":"2026-08-18T09:58:38","modified_gmt":"2026-08-18T08:58:38","slug":"prohibition-on-the-import-of-luxury-goods-to-russia-and-belarus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/foreign-trade\/prohibition-on-the-import-of-luxury-goods-to-russia-and-belarus","title":{"rendered":"Prohibition on the Import of Luxury Goods to Russia and&nbsp;Belarus"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The export ban on luxury goods to Russia or Belarus has been in force since 15 March 2022, that is, since as early as the 4th sanctions package. The initiative taken by the Nordic countries Finland and Sweden in January 2026 may therefore come as a surprise, as they described it as intolerable that Russians are still drinking expensive French red wine, smoking cigars, and eating truffles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>How does that come about?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <strong>EU&#8217;s luxury goods ban<\/strong> against Russia is set out in Article 3h of Regulation (EU) No 833\/2014 and governs the prohibition on exporting luxury goods to Russia. The specific list of the goods concerned is set out in Annex XVIII to Regulation (EU) No 833\/2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For Belarus, the corresponding rule is found in Article 1ga of Regulation (EC) No 765\/2006 in conjunction with Annex XXV to Regulation (EC) No 765\/2006.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The lists are not identical, but both clearly provide that cigars and truffles fall within the listing of luxury goods in the respective annexes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nevertheless, there is an exception in Article 3h(2a) of Regulation (EU) No 833\/2014:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;(2a) The prohibitions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply to the luxury goods listed in Annex XVIII insofar as their value exceeds EUR 300 per item, unless otherwise specified in that Annex.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For certain goods, Annex XVIII even sets higher value thresholds (for electrical household appliances, for example, the threshold only starts at \u20ac750). At first glance, these thresholds may appear to leave room for creative approaches, such as splitting individual deliveries into product components, artificially reducing the smallest external packaging units, or granting cash discounts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But beware! According to the <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/finance.ec.europa.eu\/system\/files\/2023-07\/faqs-sanctions-russia-luxury-goods_en.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\">Commission<\/a><\/strong>, the statistical value declared in the export declaration is used as the basis for calculating the value. Arbitrary and fictitious prices are excluded when determining the price paid or payable as the basis for the statistical value. This means that cash discounts and comparable rebates whose sole purpose and economic justification is to bring the price below the \u20ac300 threshold are likely to be excluded from the price calculation. Similarly, excessive splitting of deliveries and the dispatch of goods in small parcels are likely, as a rule, to constitute circumvention within the meaning of Article 12 of Regulation (EU) No 833\/2014 or Article 1m of Regulation (EC) No 765\/2006, respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It thus becomes apparent that the wording of Article 3h of Regulation (EU) No 833\/2014, and of Article 1ga of Regulation (EC) No 765\/2006, is being interpreted more generously than initially assumed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>If there is now an interest in optimising this situation, what could a tightening of the rules look like?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One option would naturally be to consider abolishing the exception in paragraph 2a, that is, the value threshold. This would increase the effectiveness of the sanctions. Should there be no political will to act at the level of legislation (i.e., at regulation level), action could still be taken at the administrative level. Both the Commission and the competent national authorities, in Germany the Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control (BAFA), could expand their FAQs with regard to the circumvention practices described. Explanatory publications outside of FAQs, such as guidance notes or explanatory letters for practitioners, would also be conceivable. Ultimately, it depends on how interested the regulators are in stricter enforcement of sanctions, and how much weight is given, in this context, to countervailing considerations such as exporters&#8217; freedom of occupation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Exporters must keep in mind the risk of criminal circumvention, whether via third countries or via Belarus into Russia. This aspect is, at the very least, being closely watched by the competent customs authorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Following this Nordic initiative in January, exporters of luxury goods should keep an eye on whether changes appear in the 20th sanctions package or whether the FAQs are tightened.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/lawyers\/julia-gnielinski\" data-type=\"page\" data-id=\"2804\">Julia Gnielinski <\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The export ban on luxury goods to Russia or Belarus has been in force since 15 March 2022, that is, since as early&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":3100,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ghostkit_customizer_options":"","ghostkit_custom_css":"","ghostkit_custom_js_head":"","ghostkit_custom_js_foot":"","ghostkit_typography":"","_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["type-post","entry","has-post-thumbnail","last-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3156"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3162,"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3156\/revisions\/3162"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3100"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ra-moellenhoff.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}